reblogged from Rachel Strohm: The colonization counterfactual
This is the first time I’ve ever seen the map in Rachel Strohm’s post — and I find it fascinating. What’s particularly interesting is how it doesn’t necessarily overlay perfectly with the “Murdock Map” of ethnic boundaries.
One of the questions I’m often asked by friends who haven’t studied African history is what might have happened to the continent if it hadn’t been colonized. It’s interesting to look at the following map of African politico-tribal units circa 1844 by Swedish artist Nikolaj Cyon in the light of this question:
I haven’t been able to find any firm documentation on the origin of the name Alkebu-lan, although a variety of questionably sourced websites suggest that it’s an Arabic phrase meaning “land of the blacks” – supposedly an original name for Africa. Cyon notes in a presentation that the map represents the culmination of an alternate history where the Black Plague killed significantly more Europeans than was actually the case, presumably reducing the amount of early colonization which would have occurred. Thus, while many of these territorial groupings appear feasible to…
View original post 221 more words